wrote a comment disagreeing with elceejo and he got me kicked off contentdb so it looks like we gotta be careful what we say.
I banned you because you look a lot like a spammer/ someone's alt - you created a load of low-effort reviews in a small amount of time, heavily biased towards tenplus1's mods
Maybe I was wrong there, but please spend some more time on reviews in the future
Very well done. Good mechanics and I like the dialogue. There are a few unpolished bits, like the unchanged hand texture. Please continue this after the jam!
I really like the graphics, it's beautiful! Kudos for making it all yourself. I found the gameplay quite painful, you could use some tooltips/HUD text for the different items
Note that this is referring to the "Code: MIT" in the README. If you intended media to be MIT too, then this should say both code and media (or just remove the Code:). If you want a different license for media, then both the package meta and README should be updated
I've removed redundant info from the long description
Idealised box art is fine as long as it depicts the content, and there are also actual screenshots as well
converted review into a thread
The existence of init.lua in the root directory makes minerest think this is a mod. Please remove or move init.lua
converted review into a thread
ContentDB wouldn't let me delete, renamed instead
I banned you because you look a lot like a spammer/ someone's alt - you created a load of low-effort reviews in a small amount of time, heavily biased towards tenplus1's mods
Maybe I was wrong there, but please spend some more time on reviews in the future
This is bizarre, devtest is not a good base to make a game from. It's designed for testing the engine
converted review into a thread
converted review into a thread
Converted to thread as this review is ultimately not helpful and spam. ContentDB already clearly informs the user whether a package is non-free
For more information on CDB's approach to non-free software, see https://content.minetest.net/help/non_free/
converted review into a thread
Done
You should never disable mod security
converted review into a thread
Converted to thread as the game has improved significantly, making this review outdated. Feel free to make a new review when ready
Converted to thread as the game has improved significantly, making this review outdated. Feel free to make a new review when ready
converted review into a thread
Converted to thread as the game has improved significantly, making this review outdated. Feel free to make a new review when ready
converted review into a thread
Converted to thread as the game has improved significantly, making this review outdated. Feel free to make a new review when ready
converted review into a thread
It would be helpful if you say 1) what you find good about NodeCore and 2) what specifically needs improving
Pretty much every game can be improved, it's not meaningful to say that
Looks like they're missing a dependency on https://content.minetest.net/packages/sorcerykid/bitwise/
It may not be appearing for you due to the
5.4 only
requirementThis isn't true. WIP games appear in the menu
Updated
Mineclone 5 provides that mod. This packages title and short desc should be changed
This was quite fun, although I sucked at it! I liked the graphics and the variety of gameplay available.
Very well done. Good mechanics and I like the dialogue. There are a few unpolished bits, like the unchanged hand texture. Please continue this after the jam!
I really like the graphics, it's beautiful! Kudos for making it all yourself. I found the gameplay quite painful, you could use some tooltips/HUD text for the different items
from judge review, 8.5/10
...this isn't on minekart though? This is a jam game
converted review to thread
No games/mods provide mcl_bossbars anymore
No games/mods provide mcl_colors anymore
No games/mods provide mcl_damage anymore
It's max 0.4.16 because default MTG already has endless apples
Removed as outdated
Removed as outdated
Removed package as it is outdated
Note that this is referring to the "Code: MIT" in the README. If you intended media to be MIT too, then this should say both code and media (or just remove the
Code:
). If you want a different license for media, then both the package meta and README should be updatedI've removed redundant info from the long description